Resumen Introducción: La dermatoporosis es un síndrome crónico de fragilidad cutánea, caracterizado por atrofia, púrpura y pseudocicatrices en piel. Objetivo: Determinar los factores asociados a dermatoporosis en una muestra de sujetos ≥ 60 años. Métodos: Estudio observacional, transversal, descriptivo y analítico de sujetos ≥ 60 años a quienes se realizó historia clínica, exploración física y aplicación de un autocuestionario diagnóstico de dermatoporosis. Para determinar los factores asociados se realizó análisis de regresión logística multivariado. Resultados: En 315 sujetos, la prevalencia de dermatoporosis fue de 29 %; 70 % fue del sexo femenino. Los factores asociados fueron edad > 75 años (p = 0.001), exposición solar prolongada (p = 0.002), ingesta de anticoagulantes/antiplaquetarios (p = 0.004), esteroides orales (p = 0.03) y enfermedad renal crónica (p = 0.03); así como, edad materna > 40 años en el último parto (p = 0.02), lactancia > 7 meses por embarazo y lactancia acumulada > 18 meses (p = 0.01). Se relacionaron con su ausencia, edad < 20 años en el primer embarazo y menopausia después de los 45 años. La correlación entre la autovaloración y el diagnóstico clínico fue muy alta (0.95, p < 0.001). Conclusiones: Los factores de riesgo asociados a dermatoporosis fueron similares a los previamente reportados.

Abstract Introduction: Dermatoporosis is a chronic cutaneous fragility syndrome, characterized by skin atrophy, purpura and pseudo-cicatrices. Objective: To determine factors associated with dermatoporosis in a sample of subjects aged ≥ 60 years. Methods: Observational, cross-sectional, descriptive, analytical study of subjects aged ≥ 60 years who underwent history taking, physical examination and application of a self-administered dermatoporosis diagnostic questionnaire. To determine the associated factors, a multivariate logistic regression analysis was used. Results: In 315 evaluated subjects, the prevalence of dermatoporosis was 29%; 70% were females. Associated risk factors were age > 75 years (p = 0.001), prolonged sun exposure (p = 0.002), use of anticoagulants/antiplatelet medications (p = 0.004), oral steroids (p = 0.03) and chronic kidney disease (p = 0.03); as well maternal age > 40 years at last pregnancy (p = 0.02), breastfeeding for > 7 months per pregnancy and > 18 cumulative months (p = 0.01). Age < 20 years at first pregnancy and menopause after 45 years were related to dermatoporosis absence. The correlation between self-assessment and clinical diagnosis was considerably high (0.95, p < 0.001). Conclusions: The risk factors associated with dermatoporosis were similar to those previously reported.

Abstract Introduction: The use of soap for skin cleansing is common among the population. However, it is possible that it causes damage to skin cells and disrupts the skin barrier. Objective: To determine the cytotoxic effect of soaps on in vitro-cultured keratinocytes and to correlate it with clinical irritation. Method: A survey was conducted to find out the most widely used commercial soaps and their number. Subsequently, their cytotoxicity was evaluated in human keratinocyte cultures using the resazurin assay. The soaps with the highest and lowest cytotoxicity were applied to the skin of healthy volunteers to assess their effect on the skin barrier using colorimetry and transepidermal water loss (TEWL) assays. Results: Of the analyzed soaps, 37 % were shown to be toxic to keratinocytes in vitro. The soap with the highest toxicity induced the highest rate of erythema and TEWL, in comparison with the least toxic soap and the vehicle used as the control solution. Conclusion: Soaps marketed for skin cleansing can contain chemical ingredients that damage human keratinocytes and cause skin barrier subclinical irritation. Their use can worsen preexisting dermatoses, generate xerotic or irritant contact dermatitis, and cause atrophy and dermatoporosis.

Resumen Introducción: El jabón para el aseo cutáneo es de empleo común entre la población, sin embargo, es posible que cause daño a las células de la piel y modifique la barrera cutánea. Objetivo: Determinar el efecto citotóxico de los jabones en queratinocitos cultivados in vitro y correlacionarlo con la irritación clínica. Método: Se realizó una encuesta para conocer los jabones comerciales más utilizados y su cantidad; posteriormente, se evaluó su citotoxicidad en cultivos de queratinocitos humanos mediante el método de resazurina. Los jabones con mayor y menor citotoxicidad se aplicaron en piel de voluntarios sanos para evaluar su efecto en la barrera cutánea mediante ensayos de colorimetría y pérdida transepidérmica de agua. Resultados: De los jabones analizados, 37 % demostró ser tóxico para los queratinocitos in vitro. El jabón con mayor toxicidad indujo el mayor índice de eritema y pérdida transepidérmica de agua, en comparación con el jabón menos tóxico y el vehículo empleado como solución control. Conclusión: Los jabones comercializados para el aseo cutáneo pueden incluir ingredientes químicos que dañan los queratinocitos humanos y causan irritación subclínica de la barrera cutánea. Su utilización puede agravar dermatosis preexistentes, generar dermatitis xerósica o de contacto irritativa y causar atrofia y dermatoporosis.

Abstract Oral mucosa has been highlighted as a suitable source of epidermal cells due to its intrinsic characteristics such as its higher proliferation rate and its obtainability. Diabetic ulcers have a worldwide prevalence that is variable (1%-11%), meanwhile treatment of this has been proven ineffective. Tissue-engineered skin plays an important role in wound care focusing on strategies such autologous dermal-epidermal substitutes. Objective The aim of this study was to obtain autologous dermal-epidermal skin substitutes from oral mucosa from diabetic subjects as a first step towards a possible clinical application for cases of diabetic foot. Material and Methods Oral mucosa was obtained from diabetic and healthy subjects (n=20 per group). Epidermal cells were isolated and cultured using autologous fibrin to develop dermal-epidermal in vitro substitutes by the air-liquid technique with autologous human serum as a supplement media. Substitutes were immunocharacterized with collagen IV and cytokeratin 5-14 as specific markers. A Student´s t- test was performed to assess the differences between both groups. Results It was possible to isolate epidermal cells from the oral mucosa of diabetic and healthy subjects and develop autologous dermal-epidermal skin substitutes using autologous serum as a supplement. Differences in the expression of specific markers were observed and the cytokeratin 5-14 expression was lower in the diabetic substitutes, and the collagen IV expression was higher in the diabetic substitutes when compared with the healthy group, showing a significant difference. Conclusion Cells from oral mucosa could be an alternative and less invasive source for skin substitutes and wound healing. A difference in collagen production of diabetic cells suggests diabetic substitutes could improve diabetic wound healing. More research is needed to determine the crosstalk between components of these skin substitutes and damaged tissues.

En Latinoamérica, la población ha abandonado la costumbre de usar sombrero y ropa tradicional para protegerse del sol. En consecuencia, es básico el uso de protectores solares si se realizan actividades bajo sol. Los protectores solares que se usan en la práctica médica son adecuados, pero su uso frecuente condiciona una carga económica que muchos pacientes no pueden solventar debido a sus costos considerables. Un protector apropiado contiene una amplia y elevada protección ultravioleta (UV) A y B. En las tiendas de conveniencia, existen numerosos protectores solares a precios más accesibles. El objetivo del estudio fue determinar la protección UV in vitro de 34 protectores solares con amplia presencia comercial (de venta sin prescripción médica) en el mercado latinoamericano. La absorbancia/transmitancia de la radiación UV se cuantificó mediante espectroscopía de transmisión difusa. Placas de sílice esmerilado fueron recubiertas con el producto y expuestas a radiación solar simulada para conocer su fotoestabilidad. Se calcularon índices como el factor de protección solar (SPF), longitud crítica de absorción (C λ), relación UVA/UVB y el índice de uniformidad espectral (SUI). Se encontró que el SPF in vitro fue inferior al establecido en las etiquetas, especialmente en aquellos con valores altos. No obstante, la mayoría de los protectores incluidos ofrecen niveles de protección UV elevados. Considerando su amplia accesibilidad y menor costo, concluimos que esta muestra comercial de protectores solares podría utilizarse en el entorno clínico para favorecer su apego junto a las otras medidas de fotoprotección sugeridas.

In Latin America, people have largely abandoned the practice of wearing hats and traditional clothing that provided skin protection. Sunscreen application has therefore become essential to protect against the increased sun exposure. The physician-prescribed medical-grade sunscreens provide sufficient sun protection but the requirement for regular use puts a financial burden on the patient that is often not sustainable. An appropriate sunscreen should provide a high and broad ultraviolet (UV) protection against UVB and UVA. Several over-the-counter (OTC) sunscreens have been developed for sale at affordable prices and are available for purchase in convenient locations, such as local grocery stores. The aim of this study was to assess the in vitro UV protection of 34 popular OTC sunscreens found in the Latin American market. UV absorbance/transmittance was quantified by diffusion transmission spectroscopy using coarse silica plaques. Photostability was tested by irradiating them with simulated solar light and calculating the sun protection factor (SPF), critical length of absorption (C λ ), UVA/UVB ratio, and the spectral uniformity index (SUI). The results indicated that the in vitro SPFs were significantly lower than the value declared on the labels, particularly for those claiming high SPF values; however, the majority of these sunscreens offered high levels of UV protection. Considering the advantages of low cost and ample accessibility, we concluded that this sample of OTC sunscreens can be beneficial to the general public by providing some level of skin protection from solar radiation, and may be promoted to improve compliance with recommended photoprotection behavior.

Background: In Mexico, information regarding sunscreen protection is not widely accessible from sources other than manufacturers. Objective: To assess the Sun Protection Factor (SPF) of 12, over the counter sunscreens for oily or acne prone skin available in the Mexican market. Setting: Dermatology Department. Autonomous University of San Luis Potosí, Mexico. Subjects and Methods: Twenty healthy volunteers of skin type III and IV were tested. Sunscreen SPFs were measured using solar simulated radiation according to FDA final monograph. Results: SPFs ranged between 7.8 and 26.9. Overall SPFs determined by solar simulator showed values between 22% to 74% less than the one advertised in their labels. Conclusions: We warn about the potential risk of SPF overestimation as many of the sunscreens tested did not comply with their offered protection. A proper regulation is needed because sunscreens are considered cosmetic products and do not require clinical tests to verify their efficacy before marketing.

Antecedentes: en México la información acerca del grado de protección de los filtros solares no es fácilmente accesible por fuentes alternas a los fabricantes. Objetivo: evaluar el factor de protección solar (FPS) de 12 filtros solares comerciales para piel oleosa existentes en el mercado mexicano. Lugar de realización: Departamento de dermatología de la Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, México. Sujetos y métodos: se evaluaron 20 voluntarios sanos con fototipos II y IV. Se determinó el FPS de estos filtros solares utilizando las recomendaciones de la FDA indicadas en su monografía final. Resultados: el FPS obtenido mostró márgenes entre 7.8 y 26.9. Los valores del FPS determinados mediante simulación solar mostró valores de 22% a 74% menores al de la etiqueta. Conclusiones: advertimos del riesgo potencial que implica la sobreestimación del FPS debido a que ninguno de los filtros evaluados demostró la protección ofrecida. Es deseable una regulación más apropiada, porque los filtros solares se consideran cosméticos y no requieren estudios clínicos para verificar su eficacia antes de su comercialización.